unknown
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
gs has a useful option -dDownScaleFactor so that for example
gs -r480 -dDownScaleFactor=3D5=20
produces images at 96dpi that are internally treated at 480dpi
hence the final result is far better than with gs -r96.
(I am talking about images containing only text and math formulas)
The quality and the number of kilobytes=20
is then about comparable to the quality and size of the dvipng
produced images, in my experiments, (I did not try to see if 4 or 6
were better than 5)
I'd expect that. But not quite as good, and not nearly as fast. :)gs -r480 -dDownScaleFactor=3D5=20
produces images at 96dpi that are internally treated at 480dpi
hence the final result is far better than with gs -r96.
(I am talking about images containing only text and math formulas)
The quality and the number of kilobytes=20
is then about comparable to the quality and size of the dvipng
produced images, in my experiments, (I did not try to see if 4 or 6
were better than 5)
/J=C5