unknown
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
just now (on my lunch hour).
=20
dear Jan-=C5ke I am very grateful to your willingness to look into=20
this, but do take your (deserved) time!
gs has a useful option -dDownScaleFactor so that for example
gs -r480 -dDownScaleFactor=3D5=20
produces images at 96dpi that are internally treated at 480dpi
hence the final result is far better than with gs -r96.
(I am talking about images containing only text and math formulas)
The quality and the number of kilobytes=20
is then about comparable to the quality and size of the dvipng
produced images, in my experiments, (I did not try to see if 4 or 6
were better than 5)
=20gs -r480 -dDownScaleFactor=3D5=20
produces images at 96dpi that are internally treated at 480dpi
hence the final result is far better than with gs -r96.
(I am talking about images containing only text and math formulas)
The quality and the number of kilobytes=20
is then about comparable to the quality and size of the dvipng
produced images, in my experiments, (I did not try to see if 4 or 6
were better than 5)
I'd expect that. But not quite as good, and not nearly as fast. :)
/J=C5
PS: maybe the reason why AUCTeX/Preview displays images in myemacs buffer on my 135dpi macbook which do not fit with the
surrounding text is to be found into these murky waters of
having png files with no indication of the real physical size?
best wishes, thanks again
Jean-Fran=E7ois